mini6909
Well-Known Member
- 註冊日期
- 2006-07-22
- 帖子
- 411
回覆: Re: Are you kidding ?! --- Jason Kidd簽約匹克PEAK
大推
SCOTT兄講的超級有道理
純粹是在商言商
NIKE不需要多花簽約金
畢竟現在JASON KIDD的商品在球鞋市場上 已經不再是主流
旗下有更多可以吸金的球星
剩餘價值就是不停的復刻以前暢銷的鞋款
少了JASON KIDD的LOGO
在市場上東西依然推的動
而站在JASON KIDD的角度上
轉換簽約也是為了自己之後退休後的生活
不過就可憐了我們這些消費者和那個成為眾矢之的的PEAK
我們再也買不到NIKE商品上任何與JASON KIDD的東西
還有得要忍受那種沒有"創意"的廠商
替一個我們喜愛的球員出一些市場大眾無法接受的鞋款
Very interesting news.
Let's look into this from several points of view. Of course, you can disagree with me:
1. Kidd is old, and he only has a few years left in his career. Chances are, Nike was not willing to give him a big contract anymore. If that is the case, Kidd would definitely go with a brand that is willing to pay; in this case, it is Peak.
2. Nike is not going to lose too much. I mean, without Kidd's logo, Zoom Flight is still go to sell, simply because it is a good pair of shoes. In addition, just think how many times Nike had retroed this shoe in the past. If Nike can put out a better shoe (i.e. Hyperdunk? Zoom Brave? Zoom BB?), what is the point of keep the old line?
3. I don't know anything about Peak; however, they definitely put themselves out there on the map. Nike started selling shoes for Asics, and copied their running shoes for years. It is that in this day and age, people pay more attention to copy right. The bottom line is, at least, they are willing to try to put the brand of in the world. Where is our brand??
Good deal or bad deal, it is just different perception. For us, it is probably a bad one. For Kidd, if he can count the money happily in his chair, why not?
大推
SCOTT兄講的超級有道理
純粹是在商言商
NIKE不需要多花簽約金
畢竟現在JASON KIDD的商品在球鞋市場上 已經不再是主流
旗下有更多可以吸金的球星
剩餘價值就是不停的復刻以前暢銷的鞋款
少了JASON KIDD的LOGO
在市場上東西依然推的動
而站在JASON KIDD的角度上
轉換簽約也是為了自己之後退休後的生活
不過就可憐了我們這些消費者和那個成為眾矢之的的PEAK
我們再也買不到NIKE商品上任何與JASON KIDD的東西
還有得要忍受那種沒有"創意"的廠商
替一個我們喜愛的球員出一些市場大眾無法接受的鞋款