PUMA Clyde All-Pro Coast 2 Coast cover

從東岸到西岸 / PUMA Clyde All-Pro ‘Coast 2 Coast’ 挺隊不挺人

chou
May 7, 2021
MIZUNO SPRING STYLE lOOKS cover-1

美津濃跟二次元原來這麼多關聯?!/ Cosplayer 麵 MIAN 的三套 MIZUNO 春季造型提案

chou
May 3, 2021
cover

來一趟摩曼頓為衣櫥換季 / 排球甜心廖苡任 多項造型全在摩曼頓

Chez Kuo
April 30, 2021

Recent Posts

新聞分享 / 這是你的 Luka Magic!Air Jordan 35 Low ‘Cosmic Deception’ 美國官網釋出發售預告

達拉斯獨行俠明星 Luka Doncic 以極高的籃球智慧馳騁球場,而今他的簽約品牌 Jordan Brand 採用 Luka Magic 的球風為靈感,推出了印有 Luka Doncic 專屬標誌的 Air Jordan 35…

網友 ReddChen 分享 / Sneaker Shopping S1E3 買鞋仔 – 台北 沃皮斯潮流 Worldpeace Outlet 暢貨中心…

其實51跟母親節前夕就走訪了幾間Outlet 這間位於西門町的沃皮斯暢貨中心 若是老鞋頭的人一定對這家不陌生 原先從金門起家,後來台北陸續開店後 今年也成立第一間Outlet門市我覺得這邊真的是大腳哥或小腳妹…

官方新聞 / 童趣原創 adidas Originals x LEGO ZX8000 樂高聯名款六色齊發

繼 2020 年童趣及創意的 A-ZX 系列合作之後,adidas Originals 與 LEGO 樂高集團再度攜手帶來 ZX 8000 系列 ”Bricks” 彩色積木系列聯名鞋款,結合了全球聞名的丹麥品牌- LEGO…

網友 webber05 開箱 / 361° AG1 Pro

本週要帶來的是目前大陸品牌361度,全力打造的AG1系列裡,頂級的AG1 Pro, 這雙AG1 也是Aaron Gordon 正式的第一雙簽名鞋 . 沒什麼意外. 今年一整年都可以看到它推出不同的版本, 那我們就來看看AG1…

官方新聞 / 劉奕兒詮釋微甜小性感 PUMA 推出 Ocean Queen 海洋時尚派對單品

PUMA 全新女力運動「SHE MOVES US」激勵全球女孩們人人都可以是耀眼獨具的女力發光體,擺脫性別、年齡、種族、傳統價值等框架束縛,釋放自己潛在的強大能量,妳也可以是那位激勵他人的 SUPER…

網友 Alex Chan 鞋評 / Nike KD14

軍備競賽下,加入新戰友的同時當然少不了添置新武器,Kevin Durant剛剛養傷歸隊,場上可怕的數據又再次令人聞風喪膽。KD系列近年引人入勝之處在於舒適性,全掌Zoom Air一向都是信心保證,而自從Air Zoom…

網友 王裴 鞋評 / 361° AG1 SE

159cm/59kg 日常鞋碼US8 這雙挑歐碼41 左踝有傷 場地:室外場 打球時間:8小時 強度:一般系籃訓練、全場5對5及一場比賽 全場打4號:籃下卡位、籃板、擦板、防守、上中策應。 - 包覆 7.5/10…

網友 Jerry Chen 鞋評 / Nike Air Zoom G.T. Cut

『NIKE的火力科技展現,但沒有完全『設計』打造屬於鞋款該有的設計理念』 NIKE Air Zoom G.T. Cut 評測者:Jerry 身高/體重:168cm / 63kg 尺寸:us 9 腳型:細長…

起點道具 / Artifact by Superga 三個系列好時尚 別再說帆布鞋無聊了

關於義大利國民鞋 Superg 的歷史傳奇,相信不用再多加贅述,若是自覺還不夠瞭解,我們貼心地附上連結(相關報導,請按此),從天然橡膠樹萃取出乳膠,經過 100…

網友 webber05 鞋評 / Air Jordan XXXI

Jordan XXXI Jordan 3字頭系列, 沒想到吧! 最後評測的是Jordan XXXI評測者資料:180CM/100KG 尺寸:US10.5 到US11 這雙Jordan 31 US10.5…

網友 以成黃 鞋評 / Nike Cosmic Unity

垃圾鞋到底垃不垃圾? 我想因應場上的位置跟打法,這個答案可能會有所不同 整雙鞋子最大的問題,極大部份是在與後腳跟的穩定性跟鞋子的包覆性,但還是比較適合體重較重的人穿着,不然也不會看到社團這麼多人拋售二手………

FACEBOOK GROUP

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Another nice surprise – Asics Gelburst 24I did not plan to wear and review this piece until recently.  A lot of people have been saying this is a very good shoes to play in with, but I have doubts toward the Asics basketball line.  Don’t get me wrong on this, Japan made Asics basketball shoes were my dream stuff like 30 some years ago when I was playing college ball in Taiwan.  Unless you were sponsored by the brand, you just could not get those shoes that were specially made and shipped straight from Japan.  Asics was actually trying hard to push their basketball products into the global scene, and paid big money to sponsor NCAA events and also signed a few NBA players in the early 90s.  Detroit Piston guard Isaiah Thomas was contracted with the brand and worn their shoes for a few seasons.  I actually bought a pair of his shoes in 94 in the black/white colorway and loved it very much.  It was Asics’ attempt to make western designed style kicks but just did not work.  When I came back from the States in early 2000s, I had to travel to Tokyo for business and bought a few pairs of Asics basketball shoes, including the early version of the Gelburst model, and worn those in games.  My impression back then for those shoes were pretty simple.  They were all solid made with a lot of attentions to details and quality, but they were all bottom heavy and lack of proper cushioning.  Going back to the present time, after reading and hearing many good things about this Gelburst 24 (G24), I thought I should give it another shot.  On top of that, since I have received a few of other replacement insoles that I have ordered, I thought maybe I should do another comparison with the shoes that equips with original insole vs. others.My plan took another sharp turn since after my first game with the original insole last Saturday, I decided to stick with the original set up for at least the day, simply because I was very impressed with the shoes.  I ended up playing with the G24 for four games straight and just loved it.  If you don’t feel like reading my long review from herein, this G24 pretty much is a combo from my two beloved kicks, UA Clutchfit Drive and Nike Hyperdunk 2014.  It was so good to the point where I am seriously thinking if I want to put replacement insoles in.  Anyway, let’s get more into details.First of all, let me get the only downside of this G24 out of the way first – sizing.  Because I vaguely remember Asics basketball shoes were all fit big, so I got a pair of 30cm, which is US size 12.5, with standard fit.  Asics also offers wide fit of this pair, but I could not find it in 30cm.  It turns out that even with standard fit toe box, this pair still fits wide and long.  I guess the perfect fit for me should be 29.5cm.  Here comes the good part of the overall design that saved this issue.  The mid-section of the G24 is actually on the narrow side and the flat and strong laces also help with the overall fit once I tight it all the way up.  For these reasons, my feet were not moving around even with the less than perfect fit.  If you are planning to grab a pair, I highly recommend you go try it on first.Remember I said Asics basketball shoes were all bottom heavy?  This G24 does not have this issue at all, and the overall weight of the it is pretty good and balanced.  My guess is that over the past 10 years or so, Asics must have readjusted its midsole compound and reduced a lot of weight of it.  The new compound now is called “Flytefoam”, it is made of Kevlar fiber and different from a lot of brands often use air infused compounds to form their insoles.  Air infused compounds, such as Lunaron, indeed provide very good cushioning but would go dead pretty quick once those air pockets break over time.  Other than the weight, the overall ride of this insole is also very good.  It is pretty stable when I ran with it.  On top of that, when I jumped for boards and defense, it gives me more than proper shock absorption that I expected.  Please pay extra attention here, I used the phrase shock absorption, but not cushioning here is because I never felt the bouncy feeling like I had with a lot of the other cushioning systems, such as Zoom Air or Micro G, but I never had issue with the G24, even after the game.  Remember I am having issue with my left ankle?  With the original insole and set up, I still felt tightness and soreness after the games, but it was not that bad comparing how I felt weeks ago.  In addition, my discomfort went away really quick and I had no issue at all the next morning.  That basically proves the Flytefoam works, at least for me personally.The traction is really good as well.  Of course, again, I am a big guy in the middle and does not do much cutting at all, but when I moved within the paint area for both defensive and offensive moves, the bites of the outsole were really solid and I never had any issue whatsoever with it.The outsole mid foot shank also doubles as part of the ventilation system.  Asics is really thoughtful and smart on this.  They put holes on the insole, the layer of the strobel, and also cuts a few open sections on the midsole, outsole, and the added shanks.  To be honest with you, because I only wear my basketball shoes indoor after I arrive at the court, I don’t usually feel if the shoes are too hot due to issues with material and ventilation.  However, I am sure the overall design Asics employees would help on cooling down the feet in general.  The other thing that I have to mention is that if you take a look at the picture of the strobel, Asics actually taped the treads on top of it.  I am sure all the other brands would just let those laying around on top of the strobel since chances are, you probably would never see those anyway.  However, what I am trying to say it, paying attention to these little details do make a customer, especially an old guy like myself feeling it is all worth what I have paid for.Now let’s take a look of the arch side of the midsole/outsole.  Asics raised the structure a little bit and it acts like the arch support.  This is not a unique design of the shoes but it is hard to make it right, at least for a person with semi-flatfoot like myself.  The often seen issue with this design, especially for most of the Asians with wider foot, is that this construction is designed too narrow or too high up and cause discomfort for the players.  The recent Air Jordan 35 is a very good example.  Whether you like the look or not is a separate issue, but that piece of plastic up in the mid foot section surely is not a friendly thing for most of us.To sum up, for a pair of shoes that you now can get around NTD 3,000, I doubt you can find a better option.  This G24 was made and designed with a lot of attention to details and I really don’t think you can find others in this price range, even with a much higher price tag, to beat it.  Even with the original price at around NTD 4,000, I still believe it is a good buy.

Another nice surprise – Asics Gelburst 24

I did not plan to wear and review this piece until recently. A lot of people have been saying this is a very good shoes to play in with, but I have doubts toward the Asics basketball line. Don’t get me wrong on this, Japan made Asics basketball shoes were my dream stuff like 30 some years ago when I was playing college ball in Taiwan. Unless you were sponsored by the brand, you just could not get those shoes that were specially made and shipped straight from Japan. Asics was actually trying hard to push their basketball products into the global scene, and paid big money to sponsor NCAA events and also signed a few NBA players in the early 90s. Detroit Piston guard Isaiah Thomas was contracted with the brand and worn their shoes for a few seasons. I actually bought a pair of his shoes in 94 in the black/white colorway and loved it very much. It was Asics’ attempt to make western designed style kicks but just did not work. When I came back from the States in early 2000s, I had to travel to Tokyo for business and bought a few pairs of Asics basketball shoes, including the early version of the Gelburst model, and worn those in games. My impression back then for those shoes were pretty simple. They were all solid made with a lot of attentions to details and quality, but they were all bottom heavy and lack of proper cushioning. Going back to the present time, after reading and hearing many good things about this Gelburst 24 (G24), I thought I should give it another shot. On top of that, since I have received a few of other replacement insoles that I have ordered, I thought maybe I should do another comparison with the shoes that equips with original insole vs. others.

My plan took another sharp turn since after my first game with the original insole last Saturday, I decided to stick with the original set up for at least the day, simply because I was very impressed with the shoes. I ended up playing with the G24 for four games straight and just loved it. If you don’t feel like reading my long review from herein, this G24 pretty much is a combo from my two beloved kicks, UA Clutchfit Drive and Nike Hyperdunk 2014. It was so good to the point where I am seriously thinking if I want to put replacement insoles in. Anyway, let’s get more into details.

First of all, let me get the only downside of this G24 out of the way first – sizing. Because I vaguely remember Asics basketball shoes were all fit big, so I got a pair of 30cm, which is US size 12.5, with standard fit. Asics also offers wide fit of this pair, but I could not find it in 30cm. It turns out that even with standard fit toe box, this pair still fits wide and long. I guess the perfect fit for me should be 29.5cm. Here comes the good part of the overall design that saved this issue. The mid-section of the G24 is actually on the narrow side and the flat and strong laces also help with the overall fit once I tight it all the way up. For these reasons, my feet were not moving around even with the less than perfect fit. If you are planning to grab a pair, I highly recommend you go try it on first.

Remember I said Asics basketball shoes were all bottom heavy? This G24 does not have this issue at all, and the overall weight of the it is pretty good and balanced. My guess is that over the past 10 years or so, Asics must have readjusted its midsole compound and reduced a lot of weight of it. The new compound now is called “Flytefoam”, it is made of Kevlar fiber and different from a lot of brands often use air infused compounds to form their insoles. Air infused compounds, such as Lunaron, indeed provide very good cushioning but would go dead pretty quick once those air pockets break over time. Other than the weight, the overall ride of this insole is also very good. It is pretty stable when I ran with it. On top of that, when I jumped for boards and defense, it gives me more than proper shock absorption that I expected. Please pay extra attention here, I used the phrase shock absorption, but not cushioning here is because I never felt the bouncy feeling like I had with a lot of the other cushioning systems, such as Zoom Air or Micro G, but I never had issue with the G24, even after the game. Remember I am having issue with my left ankle? With the original insole and set up, I still felt tightness and soreness after the games, but it was not that bad comparing how I felt weeks ago. In addition, my discomfort went away really quick and I had no issue at all the next morning. That basically proves the Flytefoam works, at least for me personally.

The traction is really good as well. Of course, again, I am a big guy in the middle and does not do much cutting at all, but when I moved within the paint area for both defensive and offensive moves, the bites of the outsole were really solid and I never had any issue whatsoever with it.

The outsole mid foot shank also doubles as part of the ventilation system. Asics is really thoughtful and smart on this. They put holes on the insole, the layer of the strobel, and also cuts a few open sections on the midsole, outsole, and the added shanks. To be honest with you, because I only wear my basketball shoes indoor after I arrive at the court, I don’t usually feel if the shoes are too hot due to issues with material and ventilation. However, I am sure the overall design Asics employees would help on cooling down the feet in general. The other thing that I have to mention is that if you take a look at the picture of the strobel, Asics actually taped the treads on top of it. I am sure all the other brands would just let those laying around on top of the strobel since chances are, you probably would never see those anyway. However, what I am trying to say it, paying attention to these little details do make a customer, especially an old guy like myself feeling it is all worth what I have paid for.

Now let’s take a look of the arch side of the midsole/outsole. Asics raised the structure a little bit and it acts like the arch support. This is not a unique design of the shoes but it is hard to make it right, at least for a person with semi-flatfoot like myself. The often seen issue with this design, especially for most of the Asians with wider foot, is that this construction is designed too narrow or too high up and cause discomfort for the players. The recent Air Jordan 35 is a very good example. Whether you like the look or not is a separate issue, but that piece of plastic up in the mid foot section surely is not a friendly thing for most of us.

To sum up, for a pair of shoes that you now can get around NTD 3,000, I doubt you can find a better option. This G24 was made and designed with a lot of attention to details and I really don’t think you can find others in this price range, even with a much higher price tag, to beat it. Even with the original price at around NTD 4,000, I still believe it is a good buy.
... See MoreSee Less

1 hour ago

Comment on Facebook

早期的款式蠻好看的,不輸勾勾的老鞋

#週一中午吃鞋評配飯 #鞋來無恙 Aaron Gordon 1代, 361 ° 今年幫這位在灌籃大賽裡的無冕之王推出的簽名鞋款評測者資料:180CM/100KG 尺寸:US10.5 到US11 (EUR44.5~45)這雙AG1 PRO EUR46 著用時間:實戰約6h+ 4h 著用場地:室內木地板+ 室外橋下PU 地板 打法:5投2切3內線,大前鋒/中鋒,中距離投籃跟內線單打,或是45度角面框進攻前言: 這雙AG1 今年沒意外, 一整年都看的到的中國品牌球鞋. 為什麼一整年都能看到呢? 因為這雙AG1 目前推出跟放出的消息己經有: AG1 一般版/ AG1 Pro/AG1 SE(夏季版)/AG1 皮質版(冬季版??) 這麼多的產品代號跟分類, 可以看的出來361 對於這雙鞋子放了多少的心力在裡面. 當然啦~也不排除是因為簽下Aaron Gordon 的代言費太貴.... 一雙鞋不多出幾個版本, 怎麼把錢賺回來. 但這雙鞋也用了不少好料在上面的感覺, 就讓我們開始本週的實戰鞋評吧.Kenlu 圖文編排版 https://kenlu.net/foro/threads/ag1-pro-361.85576/【中底緩震】《8/10》(圖1)AG1 Pro 的中底,使用361度自行研發的兩種EVA:比較靠近腳掌是所謂的全掌Neo foam:主打Q 軟的腳感. 而在Neo Foam 的下方,接續著從前掌外側一路到後掌全部的Qu!k foam,主打回彈力強勁的腳感. 看起來好像滿不錯的樣子, 在實際使用上, 真的要好好的讚賞一下啊, 膝蓋比較不年輕的朋友有褔了~~ 中底的回饋是軟偏韌的腳感.在啟動或是急停時, 不用擔心過硬的回饋. 如果用其他鞋子來比較的話, 這雙鞋的腳感是比Lebron 18代還要軟一些些, 但比Peak 閃現1代再韌許多(可參考之前Peak 閃現1鞋評) https://www.facebook.com/groups/basketball.shoe.review/permalink/3260319080736856【反應】《6.5/10》(圖2)通常看到2層中底, 大概率就是這雙鞋不是給後衛或是速度型球員使用的. 當然啦~~ Aaron Gordon 打的位置也是大前鋒/小前鋒的位置 反應需求也不是第一優先啦. 整體AG1 Pro 的反應算是嗯.... 嗯... 嗯.... 很中規中矩... 在反應上還真沒有亮點... 不過也沒有缺點啦. 要說缺點就是我相信速度型球員,可能在切入後就發現...第一步的反應... 慢了一些喔... 不過如果你是像我一樣,有時會慢慢開坦克進去(背身單打)的朋友. 這雙鞋絕對讓你開好開滿!! 每一步下腳, 這雙鞋都給你溫和但厚實的回推力. 愛背打的朋友有褔了~~ 今天有種在傳教的感覺.... 整體AG1 Pro 的反應給人一種~ 柔和中帶點厚實的感覺.【包覆性】《6.5/10》(圖3) (圖4) AG1 Pro 在不同的配色上,有一些不同的鞋面材質,而我這雙星際迷彩使用的是Engineer Mesh的複合材料. 前掌因為鞋型的原因, 有些空洞感,當然也是因為361 度那有點迷的尺吋...(等等尺吋裡說明) 不過在鞋體中段的地方(第二個鞋帶孔), 361 放上了Morphit,鞋帶系統: 其實就是用織帶讓這個鞋帶孔有空間可以讓你在拉鞋帶時, 更貼合你的腳型. 這個部分的腳感就有點見仁見智, 因為如果拉緊時,會在腳體兩側感覺到硬物跟擠壓感.另一個把整體包覆性分數拉下來的部份..就是鞋舌材質了. 是相當一般的大洞網布加相當一般的海綿.沒有什麼彈性, 完全是靠鞋帶壓在腳背上的.【版型】《8》分為1~10段, 5是剛好, 向上偏大,向下偏小(圖5)AG1 Pro的版型: 嗯.... 這雙鞋我自己試完是覺得..... 請參考Nike 的EUR碼數(歐碼)來買比較保險. 地方的先生當時想說中國的鞋,我看中國碼CM來買, 加上看了中國網友分享, 這雙偏一點點大. 我就買了28cm=Nike US10 喔... 結果上腳後... 嗯...好長啊~~~ 這個內長應該有Nike 的US11.5 了. 而Nike 的US11.5 就是EUR46. 還好鞋寬沒有太寬.但個人建議是按Eur 碼數比較安全.【抓地力】《8/10》(圖6)這雙鞋的抓地力,看到資料說 Aaron Gordon 有特別要求過. 可以看到整體的紋路相當的緊密, 而且外底的橡膠走比較軟的方向. 在室內場的表現相當良好啊~~~ 雖然不是走Jordan 31 代基基叫的方式, 但表現比Jordan 31代好相當的多. 打滑什麼的, 不用擔心啦 喜歡變向的朋友只會...駡.... X!! 怎麼有點被抓住的感覺... 果然不是設計給變向流使用的. 不過~~~ 坦克流的朋友有褔了.... 又有褔... 你再說有褔了我就.... 好啦好啦,回到室外的表現. 這雙鞋在室外的表現也還算不錯,鞋底不是太吃灰的材質, 雖然沒有室內表現的好,不過也不用擔心切入時,下一秒發現鞋底抓不住的狀況. 表現是中上級別的performance.【透氣性】《6.5/10》 (圖7)可以在AG1 Pro 上面看到, 361基本上是沒有在客氣的給料, 鞋面除了多材質拼接, 還有很多的膠片黏合來強化鞋身本體. 不過也因為又加了很多的膠片, 鞋身的透氣性只能算soso, 這也是後來再出SE 版本的原因嘍, 如果對這雙鞋有愛的, 可入手SE 版在夏天室外使用.【支撐性&抗扭】《7.5/10》(影片)在AG1 上, 前掌內外都有做一定程度的上翻,還有外側用Qu!k Balance TPU 片的三角型應力結構, 形成了相當良好的腳掌支撐型. 這個部份還有參考到懸空寺的力學原理(詳情可看頻道開箱影片介紹),雖然不知道是否真的那麼有效. 但我覺得這個口號不錯啦, 再加上中底給你一片大大的碳纖維抗扭片,多久沒看到這種東西用在Nike籃球鞋上啦? 頂在足弓位置,鞋體的支撐性算是我最滿意的地方了. 雖然也是有聽到有朋友說, 足弓處有點頂, 不過可能是在Jordan 33/34/35 的調教下, 自己本身倒是沒什麼感覺. https://youtu.be/l1F_8OcE9ww【耐磨性】《7.5/10》(圖8)第一次摸到鞋底時, 想說這種軟度的鞋底,應該不會太耐磨吧, 就像熱熔胎一樣/比一般的輪胎還軟跟不耐磨, 不過換來的就是相當良好的抓地力. 還好我又不是跑的跟車一樣快, 在室內外10個小時的使用時間下來後. 基本上沒什麼磨損.【重量】《6.5/10》 (圖9)EUR46 單隻510克重, 嗯~~ 跟Lebron 正代差不多呢~ 也是啦~給重型鋒線使用的球鞋就像坦克一樣, 坦克履帶那有不重的.離題嘍~回到鞋子本身: 在這麼多料的堆疊下, 可以理解這雙AG 1 Pro 一定不是輕量級的.【外觀】《6/10》(圖9)這個配色的外觀.... 就.... 嗯, 跟5年前的大陸球鞋比進步很多啦~自己是更喜歡另外一個配色”人民很行”... 一開始看錯...還以為是人民銀行配色. 不過人民很行的配色,在當時就算沒有BCI (友好棉花)事件,也己經缺貨了,炒價都破1000RMB 了. 實在沒辦法下手. 只能找這雙普普的配色入手.【CP值】《6/10》 這雙鞋的原始定價是699RMB, 當時是在BCI (友好棉花事件)發酵前,在淘寶用480RMB 入手的, 加上回台灣的轉運費用. 最後是用total 台幣大約21XX 左右,讓它出現在我家門口. 以中國球鞋的表現來看, 價格算是合格的, 當然在BCI 事件後...這雙鞋價格也起飛啦. 現在這個配色的AG1 Pro 也要900RMB 以上. 更不用說其他熱門配色了.【總分】《70》 這雙AG1 Pro 整體表現不錯,打大前鋒/中鋒的朋友應該會喜歡這雙鞋. 雖然堆料的做法有點像上個世代的球鞋做風. 但也要有料才能堆啊.總評: 用四種材料:Neo Foam/Qu!k foam/Qu!k Balance TPU/碳纖維板構成的中底, 中底部份表現絕對是這雙鞋的亮點. 以大前鋒需求為主的配置定位,也是這個時代少見的設定.以我的入手價來說,這雙鞋算是中國品牌在這個價位級別裡, 前幾名的選擇. 不過如果是以現在炒價的狀況來看. 可能還有更好的選擇.... 畢竟一雙人民銀行的配色回來台灣也要快5000台幣... 比Jordan 35 代一般配色還要貴個500~700 台幣左右. 這價格....就有點難以下嚥. 不過鞋子原本的售價,或是361 對Aaron Gordon &消費者的誠意, 是完全可以在這雙鞋上感受到的.

#週一中午吃鞋評配飯
#鞋來無恙
Aaron Gordon 1代, 361 ° 今年幫這位在灌籃大賽裡的無冕之王推出的簽名鞋款

評測者資料:180CM/100KG
尺寸:US10.5 到US11 (EUR44.5~45)這雙AG1 PRO EUR46
著用時間:實戰約6h+ 4h
著用場地:室內木地板+ 室外橋下PU 地板
打法:5投2切3內線,大前鋒/中鋒,中距離投籃跟內線單打,或是45度角面框進攻

前言:
這雙AG1 今年沒意外, 一整年都看的到的中國品牌球鞋. 為什麼一整年都能看到呢?
因為這雙AG1 目前推出跟放出的消息己經有: AG1 一般版/ AG1 Pro/AG1 SE(夏季版)/AG1 皮質版(冬季版??)
這麼多的產品代號跟分類, 可以看的出來361 對於這雙鞋子放了多少的心力在裡面.
當然啦~也不排除是因為簽下Aaron Gordon 的代言費太貴.... 一雙鞋不多出幾個版本, 怎麼把錢賺回來.
但這雙鞋也用了不少好料在上面的感覺, 就讓我們開始本週的實戰鞋評吧.

Kenlu 圖文編排版


【中底緩震】《8/10》(圖1)

AG1 Pro 的中底,使用361度自行研發的兩種EVA:比較靠近腳掌是所謂的全掌Neo foam:主打Q 軟的腳感.
而在Neo Foam 的下方,接續著從前掌外側一路到後掌全部的Qu!k foam,主打回彈力強勁的腳感.
看起來好像滿不錯的樣子, 在實際使用上, 真的要好好的讚賞一下啊, 膝蓋比較不年輕的朋友有褔了~~
中底的回饋是軟偏韌的腳感.在啟動或是急停時, 不用擔心過硬的回饋.
如果用其他鞋子來比較的話, 這雙鞋的腳感是比Lebron 18代還要軟一些些, 但比Peak 閃現1代再韌許多(可參考之前Peak 閃現1鞋評)
https://facebook.com/groups/…

【反應】《6.5/10》(圖2)

通常看到2層中底, 大概率就是這雙鞋不是給後衛或是速度型球員使用的.
當然啦~~ Aaron Gordon 打的位置也是大前鋒/小前鋒的位置 反應需求也不是第一優先啦.
整體AG1 Pro 的反應算是嗯.... 嗯... 嗯.... 很中規中矩... 在反應上還真沒有亮點... 不過也沒有缺點啦.
要說缺點就是我相信速度型球員,可能在切入後就發現...第一步的反應... 慢了一些喔...
不過如果你是像我一樣,有時會慢慢開坦克進去(背身單打)的朋友. 這雙鞋絕對讓你開好開滿!!
每一步下腳, 這雙鞋都給你溫和但厚實的回推力. 愛背打的朋友有褔了~~
今天有種在傳教的感覺.... 整體AG1 Pro 的反應給人一種~ 柔和中帶點厚實的感覺.

【包覆性】《6.5/10》(圖3) (圖4)
AG1 Pro 在不同的配色上,有一些不同的鞋面材質,而我這雙星際迷彩使用的是Engineer Mesh的複合材料.
前掌因為鞋型的原因, 有些空洞感,當然也是因為361 度那有點迷的尺吋...(等等尺吋裡說明)
不過在鞋體中段的地方(第二個鞋帶孔), 361 放上了Morphit,鞋帶系統: 其實就是用織帶讓這個鞋帶孔有空間可以讓你在拉鞋帶時, 更貼合你的腳型.
這個部分的腳感就有點見仁見智, 因為如果拉緊時,會在腳體兩側感覺到硬物跟擠壓感.

另一個把整體包覆性分數拉下來的部份..就是鞋舌材質了. 是相當一般的大洞網布加相當一般的海綿.沒有什麼彈性, 完全是靠鞋帶壓在腳背上的.

【版型】《8》分為1~10段, 5是剛好, 向上偏大,向下偏小(圖5)

AG1 Pro的版型: 嗯.... 這雙鞋我自己試完是覺得..... 請參考Nike 的EUR碼數(歐碼)來買比較保險.
地方的先生當時想說中國的鞋,我看中國碼CM來買, 加上看了中國網友分享, 這雙偏一點點大.
我就買了28cm=Nike US10 喔... 結果上腳後... 嗯...好長啊~~~ 這個內長應該有Nike 的US11.5 了.
而Nike 的US11.5 就是EUR46. 還好鞋寬沒有太寬.但個人建議是按Eur 碼數比較安全.

【抓地力】《8/10》(圖6)

這雙鞋的抓地力,看到資料說 Aaron Gordon 有特別要求過. 可以看到整體的紋路相當的緊密, 而且外底的橡膠走比較軟的方向.
在室內場的表現相當良好啊~~~ 雖然不是走Jordan 31 代基基叫的方式, 但表現比Jordan 31代好相當的多. 打滑什麼的, 不用擔心啦
喜歡變向的朋友只會...駡.... X!! 怎麼有點被抓住的感覺... 果然不是設計給變向流使用的.
不過~~~ 坦克流的朋友有褔了.... 又有褔... 你再說有褔了我就.... 好啦好啦,回到室外的表現.
這雙鞋在室外的表現也還算不錯,鞋底不是太吃灰的材質, 雖然沒有室內表現的好,不過也不用擔心切入時,下一秒發現鞋底抓不住的狀況.
表現是中上級別的performance.

【透氣性】《6.5/10》 (圖7)

可以在AG1 Pro 上面看到, 361基本上是沒有在客氣的給料, 鞋面除了多材質拼接, 還有很多的膠片黏合來強化鞋身本體.
不過也因為又加了很多的膠片, 鞋身的透氣性只能算soso, 這也是後來再出SE 版本的原因嘍, 如果對這雙鞋有愛的, 可入手SE 版在夏天室外使用.

【支撐性&抗扭】《7.5/10》(影片)

在AG1 上, 前掌內外都有做一定程度的上翻,還有外側用Qu!k Balance TPU 片的三角型應力結構, 形成了相當良好的腳掌支撐型.
這個部份還有參考到懸空寺的力學原理(詳情可看頻道開箱影片介紹),雖然不知道是否真的那麼有效.
但我覺得這個口號不錯啦, 再加上中底給你一片大大的碳纖維抗扭片,多久沒看到這種東西用在Nike籃球鞋上啦?
頂在足弓位置,鞋體的支撐性算是我最滿意的地方了. 雖然也是有聽到有朋友說, 足弓處有點頂, 不過可能是在Jordan 33/34/35 的調教下, 自己本身倒是沒什麼感覺.


【耐磨性】《7.5/10》(圖8)

第一次摸到鞋底時, 想說這種軟度的鞋底,應該不會太耐磨吧, 就像熱熔胎一樣/比一般的輪胎還軟跟不耐磨, 不過換來的就是相當良好的抓地力.
還好我又不是跑的跟車一樣快, 在室內外10個小時的使用時間下來後. 基本上沒什麼磨損.

【重量】《6.5/10》 (圖9)

EUR46 單隻510克重, 嗯~~ 跟Lebron 正代差不多呢~ 也是啦~給重型鋒線使用的球鞋就像坦克一樣,
坦克履帶那有不重的.離題嘍~回到鞋子本身: 在這麼多料的堆疊下, 可以理解這雙AG 1 Pro 一定不是輕量級的.

【外觀】《6/10》(圖9)

這個配色的外觀.... 就.... 嗯, 跟5年前的大陸球鞋比進步很多啦~自己是更喜歡另外一個配色”人民很行”... 一開始看錯...還以為是人民銀行配色.
不過人民很行的配色,在當時就算沒有BCI (友好棉花)事件,也己經缺貨了,炒價都破1000RMB 了. 實在沒辦法下手. 只能找這雙普普的配色入手.

【CP值】《6/10》
這雙鞋的原始定價是699RMB, 當時是在BCI (友好棉花事件)發酵前,在淘寶用480RMB 入手的, 加上回台灣的轉運費用.
最後是用total 台幣大約21XX 左右,讓它出現在我家門口. 以中國球鞋的表現來看, 價格算是合格的,
當然在BCI 事件後...這雙鞋價格也起飛啦. 現在這個配色的AG1 Pro 也要900RMB 以上. 更不用說其他熱門配色了.

【總分】《70》
這雙AG1 Pro 整體表現不錯,打大前鋒/中鋒的朋友應該會喜歡這雙鞋.
雖然堆料的做法有點像上個世代的球鞋做風. 但也要有料才能堆啊.

總評:
用四種材料:Neo Foam/Qu!k foam/Qu!k Balance TPU/碳纖維板構成的中底, 中底部份表現絕對是這雙鞋的亮點.
以大前鋒需求為主的配置定位,也是這個時代少見的設定.以我的入手價來說,這雙鞋算是中國品牌在這個價位級別裡, 前幾名的選擇.
不過如果是以現在炒價的狀況來看. 可能還有更好的選擇.... 畢竟一雙人民銀行的配色回來台灣也要快5000台幣...
比Jordan 35 代一般配色還要貴個500~700 台幣左右. 這價格....就有點難以下嚥.
不過鞋子原本的售價,或是361 對Aaron Gordon &消費者的誠意, 是完全可以在這雙鞋上感受到的.
... See MoreSee Less

2 hours ago

Comment on Facebook

NFO用在休閒鞋上也不錯 😂

這雙真的很棒,而且這款也算是沒漲價的配色之一,個人為170/95 的大體重的射手偶爾打反擊的快攻。這雙可以跟全城9也能一較高下,順道問一下,您事用淘寶買下用淘寶轉運的方式購買對嗎

我入了三雙

最近也入手一雙,以這價位來說質感真的很好

【球鞋請益】
各位社友好
身高體重:175/85
打法:7投3切
穿過鞋款:Lillard2(服役中)、Crazylight boost 2016、Kobe11

-
Lillard2已經開口笑
最近考慮買新鞋,以Lillard2為標準
希望是中筒或低筒、緩震性與Bounce相近

-
看了許多鞋評
對Asics Gelburst 24、25蠻感興趣的
想請問有穿過Bounce鞋款和Gelburst24、25的社友
兩者的緩震性相近嗎?
或是有推薦其他緩震類似Bounce的其他品牌鞋款?
感謝各位!
... See MoreSee Less

1 day ago

Comment on Facebook

bounce的話,Dame 3/4/5都是不錯的選擇

d.o.n issue 2

大使13

您跟我的體型差不多,如果有考慮GelBurst那也可以往上考慮看看NovaSurge

T Mac 2 evo

Gelburst 踩起來不像bounce 會有一點軟但是又不會太軟的感覺,Gelburst 其實沒什麼太直接的腳感,但是打完球膝蓋不會痛,絕對不會讓你失望。

我跟你身材差不多,gelburst很可以 實戰首選 (穿過Aj34 kd13都被我出清了)

Gelburst25+1

Adidas explosive bounce 2018

不考慮zoom gt 嗎?

180/83 打法偏禁區,Gelbust 24服役中,除了Size不好抓之外沒啥缺點。

看你穿的鞋款都以輕快、反應性為主,本來想推Gelhoop V13的,但一看這體重覺得佩服,應該是有新鮮的膝蓋😂 Gelburst的腳感雖然跟bounce一樣偏韌,但後者多了一點點彈的感覺,亞瑟士則是很神奇的感覺不到緩震的存在但又不震腳。建議可以考慮Gelburst 24 low,現在折扣下來會比25好入手,但兩代之間差異很小。

34歲後幾乎沒打球,今年40重新回到球場。 手上主力是Pro Model 2g low跟 Gelbust 25PM2G是bounce底,緩震差Gelbust一點,然後是愛跌倒的不跟腳。但做為外場拿來磨我覺得很OK,因為夠便宜。Gelbust的緩震真的讓我很驚艷,不是踩屎感,但腳底有不覺得酸或麻

GH1

D Lillard 2是我喜歡上Adidas的開端(已完全磨平),我現在正在穿Gelburst 25,我的想法是D Lillard 2前期Bounce會有點軟的感覺,後期會踩實;然後Gelburst 25它不是像那種很軟及很彈的感覺,但是緩震上不震腳、膝蓋也不疼,若能接受D Lillard 2的話Gelburst也沒什麼問題,但從體重上的考量會更建議您上到Nova Surge

穿過有bounce的don 1,當我拿到gelburst 24 ,穿去打球後,回家馬上上網吧Don 1賣掉,馬上變心變亞瑟士粉了

你需要緩震的PG4or5

Rose 773-2020,真的bounce,又算中筒🤣,重點是很便宜。 PUMA的clyde all pro不錯,只是真的價格偏高。

Harden B/E 2 ,3

361 AG1pro 或者AG1 SE 可以是你的選擇之一

View more comments

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
[NovaBlast磨損程度]雖然二代在兩個月後要上市了,還是要好好把一代好好的研究一下 😁。(沒錢買新鞋的藉口XD) 累積里程:  300K以上 路線: 全柏油路 (平路河濱90%,山路10%) 配速: 平均4:50。請看圖,藍色是同事剛買的新鞋,白色是我的老鞋。 磨損真的讓我大吃一驚,以為超厚底的後跟一定很慘,但實際上還沒傷到中底。之前我的Nike Turbo,250K整個後跟都歪掉了。我的metaracer,也是200多公里後跟就磨到中底。 前掌磨損更不用說,nova算是輕微,沒意外的話,大約可以+700K。不過這雙抓地力不是很好,不建議壽命後期穿去山路或是濕滑的下雨天。

[NovaBlast磨損程度]

雖然二代在兩個月後要上市了,還是要好好把一代好好的研究一下 😁。(沒錢買新鞋的藉口XD)
累積里程: 300K以上
路線: 全柏油路 (平路河濱90%,山路10%)
配速: 平均4:50。

請看圖,藍色是同事剛買的新鞋,白色是我的老鞋。
磨損真的讓我大吃一驚,以為超厚底的後跟一定很慘,但實際上還沒傷到中底。之前我的Nike Turbo,250K整個後跟都歪掉了。我的metaracer,也是200多公里後跟就磨到中底。
前掌磨損更不用說,nova算是輕微,沒意外的話,大約可以+700K。不過這雙抓地力不是很好,不建議壽命後期穿去山路或是濕滑的下雨天。
... See MoreSee Less

3 days ago

Comment on Facebook

我的後跟也是磨損速度驚人到懷疑人生

超值好鞋!

我的559k,鞋底也差不多這樣了

這雙腳感跟turbo類似嗎

1450到底有多厲害我是不知道, 我只知道桃色電商的$1439這價格讓我直接投降…(期待今晚初跑)

1450到底有多厲害我是不知道,
我只知道桃色電商的$1439這價格讓我直接投降…

(期待今晚初跑)
... See MoreSee Less

4 days ago

Comment on Facebook

好看ㄟ

請問鞋子版型如何?謝謝

我第一雙跑鞋就是銳步的欸,好懷念

原尺寸,好穿這雙

可以偷偷告訴我哪買的,一起入坑

請問軟嗎

請問型號

期待你的試跑文

我也不小心敗了

很想敗,但我香港🥺

超推這雙,夠彈

蔡季勳

這個價錢真的是情緒勒索,所以我剛才也下單一雙了~XD

Yahoo購物還可以用折價券-100

不小心幫媽媽也買一雙🙊

聽說有boost的腳感,有疑慮

View more comments

跑不完啊~ 回不了家

跑不完啊~ 回不了家 ... See MoreSee Less

2 days ago

Comment on Facebook

加油 💪,我都平常中午跑

不要太勉強啊

不要一次跑週跑量的距離

安全第一

騎Ubike

降速跑,做好體力分配啊!

View more comments

INSTAGRAM

重點性能條列
PUMA Clyde All-Pro ‘Coast 2 Coast’
-
• 含有碳纖維紗線的 Matryx 針織鞋面
• 中足 ProPlate 穩定片增加底盤剛性
• ProFoam 科技為中底主體
• 後跟增添 ProFoam+ 科技 (Pebax) 組成的雙密度避震
• 中底、外底挖溝槽減輕重量(US11 單腳約 400g)
• ‘Coast 2 Coast’ 鞋側 Foamstripe 使用皮革材質
• 已於臺灣 PUMA 官網登場 NT$4,280

📷 @pumahoops
...

NEWS